MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325869

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood · 2023

External validation of a multivariable prediction model for identification of pneumonia and other serious bacterial infections in febrile immunocompromised children.

Martin Alexander James, van der Velden Fabian Johannes Stanislaus, von Both Ulrich, Tsolia Maria N, Zenz Werner, Sagmeister Manfred, Vermont Clementien, de Vries Gabriella, Kolberg Laura, Lim Emma, Pokorn Marko, Zavadska Dace, Martinón-Torres Federico, Rivero-Calle Irene, Hagedoorn Nienke N, Usuf Effua, Schlapbach Luregn, Kuijpers Taco W, Pollard Andrew J, Yeung Shunmay, Fink Colin, Voice Marie, Carrol Enitan, Agyeman Philipp K A, Khanijau Aakash, Paulus Stephane, De Tisham, Herberg Jethro Adam, Levin Michael, van der Flier Michiel, de Groot Ronald, Nijman Ruud, Emonts Marieke, PERFORM consortium

Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To externally validate and update the Feverkids tool clinical prediction model for differentiating bacterial pneumonia and other serious bacterial infections (SBIs) from non-SBI causes of fever in immunocompromised children.

DESIGN

International, multicentre, prospective observational study embedded in PErsonalised Risk assessment in Febrile illness to Optimise Real-life Management across the European Union (PERFORM).

SETTING

Fifteen teaching hospitals in nine European countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Febrile immunocompromised children aged 0-18 years.

METHODS

The Feverkids clinical prediction model predicted the probability of bacterial pneumonia, other SBI or no SBI. Model discrimination, calibration and diagnostic performance at different risk thresholds were assessed. The model was then re-fitted and updated.

RESULTS

Of 558 episodes, 21 had bacterial pneumonia, 104 other SBI and 433 no SBI. Discrimination was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.90) for bacterial pneumonia, with moderate calibration and 0.67 (0.61 to 0.72) for other SBIs, with poor calibration. After model re-fitting, discrimination improved to 0.88 (0.79 to 0.96) and 0.71 (0.65 to 0.76) and calibration improved. Predicted risk <1% ruled out bacterial pneumonia with sensitivity 0.95 (0.86 to 1.00) and negative likelihood ratio (LR) 0.09 (0.00 to 0.32). Predicted risk >10% ruled in bacterial pneumonia with specificity 0.91 (0.88 to 0.94) and positive LR 6.51 (3.71 to 10.3). Predicted risk <10% ruled out other SBIs with sensitivity 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97) and negative LR 0.32 (0.13 to 0.57). Predicted risk >30% ruled in other SBIs with specificity 0.89 (0.86 to 0.92) and positive LR 2.86 (1.91 to 4.25).

CONCLUSION

Discrimination and calibration were good for bacterial pneumonia but poorer for other SBIs. The rule-out thresholds have the potential to reduce unnecessary investigations and antibiotics in this high-risk group.

Для цитирования: Martin Alexander James, van der Velden Fabian Johannes Stanislaus, von Both Ulrich, Tsolia Maria N, Zenz Werner, Sagmeister Manfred, Vermont Clementien, de Vries Gabriella, Kolberg Laura, Lim Emma, Pokorn Marko, Zavadska Dace, Martinón-Torres Federico, Rivero-Calle Irene, Hagedoorn Nienke N, Usuf Effua, Schlapbach Luregn, Kuijpers Taco W, Pollard Andrew J, Yeung Shunmay, Fink Colin, Voice Marie, Carrol Enitan, Agyeman Philipp K A, Khanijau Aakash, Paulus Stephane, De Tisham, Herberg Jethro Adam, Levin Michael, van der Flier Michiel, de Groot Ronald, Nijman Ruud, Emonts Marieke, PERFORM consortium. External validation of a multivariable prediction model for identification of pneumonia and other serious bacterial infections in febrile immunocompromised children.. Archives of disease in childhood. 2023. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325869.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.