DOI 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318205d4d5
Abnormalities of cervical arteries in children with arterial ischemic stroke.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To describe the frequency of cervical arterial abnormalities in children with acute arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), to examine predictors of this, and to characterize observed abnormalities in terms of specific diagnoses.
METHODS
Review of case notes of children with AIS (2002-2009) and analysis of their neuroimaging for infarct location and presence, location, and nature of arterial disease. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between age, infarct distribution, number of risk factors, antecedent trauma, and the presence of cervical arterial disease.
RESULTS
Sixty children (31 boys, median age 5 years 3 months) were included. Cerebral infarction was in the anterior circulation only in 50 (25 purely subcortical), the posterior circulation only in 9, and both distributions in 1. Cervical arterial abnormalities occurred in 15/60 (25%) and intracranial abnormalities in 26. There was no significant relationship between the presence of an abnormality in the intracranial and cervical magnetic resonance angiogram (Fisher exact test, p = 0.29). Cervical arterial disease was categorized as definite arterial dissection in 2 cases, probable arterial dissection in 7, nonspecific occlusive arteriopathy in 5, and a migrated vaso-occlusive device in 1. In logistic regression analysis, infarction in the distribution of the posterior circulation significantly predicted the presence of a cervical arterial abnormality (p = 0.04); age, number of risk factors, and antecedent trauma were not predictive.
CONCLUSION
Cervical arteriopathy is common in children with AIS, especially in posterior circulation infarction. The cervical vasculature should be imaged in all children with AIS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.