Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2019
Pimavanserin versus quetiapine for the treatment of psychosis in Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Horn Sarah, Richardson Hayley, Xie Sharon X, Weintraub Daniel, Dahodwala Nabila
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Psychosis is common among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Limited data exist on the most effective therapies.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients with PD or DLB initiated on quetiapine or pimavanserin for psychosis. Primary outcome was time to discontinuation of pimavanserin or quetiapine using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We hypothesized the rate of antipsychotic discontinuation would be lower in the pimavanserin group. Subjects were included if the indication for treatment was psychosis and excluded if there was a history of major mental illness or no follow up data were available.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the quetiapine cohort and 45 in the pimavanserin cohort. Patients in the pimavanserin cohort were more likely to have a diagnosis of DLB (33% vs. 11%, P = 0.01) and to have been prescribed an antipsychotic previously (62% vs. 6%, P < 0.01); otherwise, the groups were similar. Time to discontinuation analysis, which accounts for efficacy, safety and tolerability, revealed a lower early pimavanserin discontinuation rate and a higher late pimavanserin discontinuation rate (HR < 1 before day 43, HR > 1 after day 43; P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality in the pimavanserin group compared to the quetiapine group (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.45; P = 0.88). More individuals had a documented secondary indication for taking quetiapine than pimavanserin (38% vs. 4%; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Accounting for efficacy, safety and tolerability, pimavanserin may be more clinically useful for promptly managing psychosis, while quetiapine may confer additional secondary benefits long-term.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients with PD or DLB initiated on quetiapine or pimavanserin for psychosis. Primary outcome was time to discontinuation of pimavanserin or quetiapine using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We hypothesized the rate of antipsychotic discontinuation would be lower in the pimavanserin group. Subjects were included if the indication for treatment was psychosis and excluded if there was a history of major mental illness or no follow up data were available.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the quetiapine cohort and 45 in the pimavanserin cohort. Patients in the pimavanserin cohort were more likely to have a diagnosis of DLB (33% vs. 11%, P = 0.01) and to have been prescribed an antipsychotic previously (62% vs. 6%, P < 0.01); otherwise, the groups were similar. Time to discontinuation analysis, which accounts for efficacy, safety and tolerability, revealed a lower early pimavanserin discontinuation rate and a higher late pimavanserin discontinuation rate (HR < 1 before day 43, HR > 1 after day 43; P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality in the pimavanserin group compared to the quetiapine group (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.45; P = 0.88). More individuals had a documented secondary indication for taking quetiapine than pimavanserin (38% vs. 4%; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Accounting for efficacy, safety and tolerability, pimavanserin may be more clinically useful for promptly managing psychosis, while quetiapine may confer additional secondary benefits long-term.