MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mog.0b013e3283346fae

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2010

Enteral nutrition in patients with dementia and stroke.

Freeman Cecilia, Ricevuto Ashleigh, DeLegge Mark H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients suffering from dementia or significant cognitive impairment (SCI) due to neurologic injury routinely receive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) due to swallowing difficulty or lack of appetite. This review discusses current data and opinion regarding the risks and benefits of PEG in these populations.

RECENT FINDINGS: The current data regarding PEG placement in patients with dementia or SCI due to neurologic injury do not confirm either improvement or worsening of survival. Significant risk factors for poor prognosis after PEG include sex, hypoalbuminemia, age, chronic heart failure, and subtotal gastrectomy. Complications associated with enteral nutrition are minor and easily controlled when managed by a nutritional team. Alternative options for feeding elderly demented patients are available for family members considering PEG.

SUMMARY: In contrast to previously published data regarding worse clinical outcomes in the dementia and SCI populations receiving PEG, recent data suggest that clinical outcomes in this population are no different than in other patient populations receiving PEG. A prospective, randomized study is needed to ascertain whether PEG is appropriate and beneficial in the dementia/SCI populations.

Для цитирования: Freeman Cecilia, Ricevuto Ashleigh, DeLegge Mark H. Enteral nutrition in patients with dementia and stroke.. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e3283346fae.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.