Psychopharmacology · 2001
Effects of high-affinity GABAB receptor antagonists on active and passive avoidance responding in rodents with gamma-hydroxybutyrolactone-induced absence syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Getova D P, Bowery N G
Аннотация
RATIONALE: Absence seizures in man are behaviourally manifested as arrest and mild jerks mainly of facial muscles, associated in the electroencephalogram with synchronous spike and wave discharges. Gamma-hydroxybutyrolactone (GHBL) administration is currently used as an experimental model of absence seizures in rats and mice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of three potent gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor antagonists CGP55845A, CGP62349 and CGP71982 (0.01 mg/kg) on the development of GHBL-induced absence epilepsy and in learning paradigms of active and passive avoidance tests in GHBL-treated mice and rats.
METHODS: After 4 weeks of development of the absence syndrome, active and passive avoidance tests with negative reinforcement were performed. In both animal species, the absence syndrome was observed after 3 weeks of treatment in the saline group.
RESULTS: The GABAB receptor antagonists CGP55845A and CGP62349 appeared to suppress the development of the absence syndrome to a greater degree in mice than in rats. CGP71982 suppressed it later than the other two antagonists (fifth week). In an active avoidance test in GHBL-treated mice, the GABAB antagonists had different effects - CGP62349 improved learning and memory retention to a greater extent than CGP55845A, whilst CGP71982 had no influence on it. In a passive avoidance test in GHBL-treated mice, the GABAB antagonists also had different effects - CGP71982 improved both learning and memory retrieval, whereas CGP55845A and CGP62349 had no effect. In the active avoidance test in GHBL-treated rats, the GABAB antagonist CGP55845A improved learning, whereas the other two, CGP62349 and CGP71982, had no effect. In the passive avoidance test the GHBL-treated rats showed an improvement in short memory retrieval. CGP55845A and CGP71982 improved this further, whilst CGP62349 had no effect.
CONCLUSIONS: GHBL appeared to influence mice and rats in a different manner - rats learned the active avoidance task better than the GHBL-treated mice. The present study confirms previous data that GABAB antagonists suppress absence behaviour.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of three potent gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor antagonists CGP55845A, CGP62349 and CGP71982 (0.01 mg/kg) on the development of GHBL-induced absence epilepsy and in learning paradigms of active and passive avoidance tests in GHBL-treated mice and rats.
METHODS: After 4 weeks of development of the absence syndrome, active and passive avoidance tests with negative reinforcement were performed. In both animal species, the absence syndrome was observed after 3 weeks of treatment in the saline group.
RESULTS: The GABAB receptor antagonists CGP55845A and CGP62349 appeared to suppress the development of the absence syndrome to a greater degree in mice than in rats. CGP71982 suppressed it later than the other two antagonists (fifth week). In an active avoidance test in GHBL-treated mice, the GABAB antagonists had different effects - CGP62349 improved learning and memory retention to a greater extent than CGP55845A, whilst CGP71982 had no influence on it. In a passive avoidance test in GHBL-treated mice, the GABAB antagonists also had different effects - CGP71982 improved both learning and memory retrieval, whereas CGP55845A and CGP62349 had no effect. In the active avoidance test in GHBL-treated rats, the GABAB antagonist CGP55845A improved learning, whereas the other two, CGP62349 and CGP71982, had no effect. In the passive avoidance test the GHBL-treated rats showed an improvement in short memory retrieval. CGP55845A and CGP71982 improved this further, whilst CGP62349 had no effect.
CONCLUSIONS: GHBL appeared to influence mice and rats in a different manner - rats learned the active avoidance task better than the GHBL-treated mice. The present study confirms previous data that GABAB antagonists suppress absence behaviour.