MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00680.x

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2008

Cognitive and linguistic skills in Swedish children with cochlear implants - measures of accuracy and latency as indicators of development.

Wass Malin, Ibertsson Tina, Lyxell Björn, Sahlén Birgitta, Hällgren Mathias, Larsby Birgitta, Mäki-Torkko Elina

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of the present study was to examine working memory (WM) capacity, lexical access and phonological skills in 19 children with cochlear implants (CI) (5;7-13;4 years of age) attending grades 0-2, 4, 5 and 6 and to compare their performance with 56 children with normal hearing. Their performance was also studied in relation to demographic factors. The findings indicate that children with CI had visuospatial WM capacities equivalent to the comparison group. They had lower performance levels on most of the other cognitive tests. Significant differences between the groups were not found in all grades and a number of children with CI performed within 1 SD of the mean of their respective grade-matched comparison group on most of the cognitive measures. The differences between the groups were particularly prominent in tasks of phonological WM. The results are discussed with respect to the effects of cochlear implants on cognitive development.

Для цитирования: Wass Malin, Ibertsson Tina, Lyxell Björn, Sahlén Birgitta, Hällgren Mathias, Larsby Birgitta, Mäki-Torkko Elina. Cognitive and linguistic skills in Swedish children with cochlear implants - measures of accuracy and latency as indicators of development.. Scandinavian journal of psychology. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00680.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.