Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2022
Parents with intellectual disability and mental health conditions: Early intervention providers' perceptions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Edwards Nicole Megan, Lieberman-Betz Rebecca, Wiegand Sarah
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It is highly recommended that professionals promote caregivers' capacity-building to use intervention strategies to support children with developmental delays or disabilities in natural learning environments, particularly in the earliest years of life. There is a gap, however, in understanding the extent to which these professionals may feel supported in tailoring outreach to support parents with Intellectual Disability and/or mental health conditions (MHCs).
METHODS: We surveyed providers (n = 55) who work with families of infants and toddlers in Early Intervention programs across the United States.
RESULTS: Most had at least one family with intellectual disability (87%) or a MHC (92%). At least half felt parents with intellectual disability or MHCs warranted more time/resources (64% or 50%, respectively) and half were "extremely interested" in trainings to support parents with intellectual disability (48%) or MHCs (56%).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings and implications are discussed.
METHODS: We surveyed providers (n = 55) who work with families of infants and toddlers in Early Intervention programs across the United States.
RESULTS: Most had at least one family with intellectual disability (87%) or a MHC (92%). At least half felt parents with intellectual disability or MHCs warranted more time/resources (64% or 50%, respectively) and half were "extremely interested" in trainings to support parents with intellectual disability (48%) or MHCs (56%).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings and implications are discussed.