Annals of surgical oncology · 2017
Influence of Preoperative Therapy on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cloyd Jordan M, Wang Huamin, Overman Michael, Zhao Jun, Denbo Jason, Prakash Laura, Kim Michael P, Shroff Rachna, Javle Milind, Varadhachary Gauri R, Fogelman David, Wolff Robert A, Koay Eugene J, Das Prajnan, Maitra Anirban, Aloia Thomas A, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas, Fleming Jason B, Lee Jeffrey E, Katz Matthew H G
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Although preoperative therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of preoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is undefined.
METHODS: All patients with ampullary cancer who were evaluated between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative complications, and overall survival were compared between patients who underwent surgery de novo and those who received preoperative therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy: 43 (30.3%) who received preoperative therapy and 99 (69.7%) who did not. Preoperative therapy consisted of chemoradiation (65%), chemotherapy (7%), or both (28%). Patients who underwent surgery first had a lower comorbidity index (p < 0.05) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and chemoradiation (p < 0.0001). Tumors resected de novo were larger (p < 0.01) and had a different histopathologic subtype distribution (p < 0.01) on final pathology than those resected following preoperative therapy. Six (14.0%) patients demonstrated a complete pathologic response. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, LR (9.1 vs. 7.0%), median survival (107 vs. 146 months), or 5-year overall survival (60.6 vs. 70.4%). On multivariate cox regression analysis, the receipt of preoperative therapy was not associated with improved survival (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-2.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Although these data do not support the routine administration of preoperative therapy to all patients with ampullary cancer, the delivery of preoperative therapy represents an alternative strategy that is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears appropriate for a subset of patients.
METHODS: All patients with ampullary cancer who were evaluated between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative complications, and overall survival were compared between patients who underwent surgery de novo and those who received preoperative therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy: 43 (30.3%) who received preoperative therapy and 99 (69.7%) who did not. Preoperative therapy consisted of chemoradiation (65%), chemotherapy (7%), or both (28%). Patients who underwent surgery first had a lower comorbidity index (p < 0.05) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and chemoradiation (p < 0.0001). Tumors resected de novo were larger (p < 0.01) and had a different histopathologic subtype distribution (p < 0.01) on final pathology than those resected following preoperative therapy. Six (14.0%) patients demonstrated a complete pathologic response. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, LR (9.1 vs. 7.0%), median survival (107 vs. 146 months), or 5-year overall survival (60.6 vs. 70.4%). On multivariate cox regression analysis, the receipt of preoperative therapy was not associated with improved survival (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-2.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Although these data do not support the routine administration of preoperative therapy to all patients with ampullary cancer, the delivery of preoperative therapy represents an alternative strategy that is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears appropriate for a subset of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAmpulla of VaterChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreaticoduodenectomyPreoperative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate