MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016489.2020.1826575

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2020

Comorbidity of cerebellopontine angle meningioma with other primary neoplasms.

Xue Yi-Ting, Chen Hsin-Lin, Young Yi-Ho

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Meningioma is known to be accompanied by other primary neoplasms, yet has been evaluated less than these.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated comorbidity of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningioma with other primary neoplasms.

METHODS

Overall 1,085 meningioma cases including 16 meningiomas at the CPA were enrolled for investigating the presence of other primary neoplasms. Another 16 age-, sex-, and size-matched CPA schwannoma were also included for comparison.

RESULTS

Of a data-base cohort study of overall 1085 meningioma cases, 165 cases (15%) were associated with other primary neoplasms. In contrast, 8 (50%) of 16 CPA meningioma and one (8%) of 16 CPA schwannoma showed other primary neoplasms. Except for one patient who had oral cancer prior to the diagnosis of CPA meningioma by 4 years, the interval from diagnosis of CPA meningioma to that of other primary neoplasm ranged 0-6 (mean, 3.1 ± 2.5) years.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of comorbidity with other primary neoplasms is significantly higher in CPA meningioma (50%) than overall meningioma (15%) and CPA schwannoma (8%). In addition to follow-up MR imaging to visualize both residual tumor and regional brain environment after treatment of CPA meningioma, long-term systemic screening for other primary neoplasm is also mandatory.

Для цитирования: Xue Yi-Ting, Chen Hsin-Lin, Young Yi-Ho. Comorbidity of cerebellopontine angle meningioma with other primary neoplasms.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1826575.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.