Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
Differences in nerve excitability properties across upper limb sensory and motor axons.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carroll Antonia S, Howells James, Lin Cindy S Y, Park Susanna B, Simon Neil, Reilly Mary M, Vucic Steve, Kiernan Matthew C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The excitability of motor and sensory axons of the main upper limb nerves were compared to characterise the differences between nerves and provide a guide for future studies in human diseases with median neuropathy at the wrist.
METHODS: Axonal excitability studies were undertaken on median and ulnar motor (APB and ADM) and sensory axons (D2 and D5) and the superficial radial axons (D1) using a threshold tracking technique.
RESULTS: Compared to the median, ulnar motor axons had reduced early depolarising threshold electrotonus (TEd40(10-20 ms) p = 0.02) and superexcitability (p = 0.03). The ulnar sensory axons required a stronger stimulus (p = 0.02) and had a larger rheobase (p = 0.02) than median axons, but were otherwise comparable. The superficial radial axons were "fanned-in" compared to median, and to a lesser degree ulnar axons, with greater resting I/V slope. Mathematical modelling of the radial and median sensory axons suggested that a 15.1% reduction in conductances between nodal and internodal compartments accounted for 82% of this discrepancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The excitability parameters of motor and sensory axons are most comparable between median and ulnar nerves.
SIGNIFICANCE: The present study demonstrates the feasibility of, and provides normative data for, axonal excitability recordings of the radial and ulnar nerves. We suggest the use of ulnar recordings as an alternative to the median nerve in the setting of compressive neuropathy at the wrist.
METHODS: Axonal excitability studies were undertaken on median and ulnar motor (APB and ADM) and sensory axons (D2 and D5) and the superficial radial axons (D1) using a threshold tracking technique.
RESULTS: Compared to the median, ulnar motor axons had reduced early depolarising threshold electrotonus (TEd40(10-20 ms) p = 0.02) and superexcitability (p = 0.03). The ulnar sensory axons required a stronger stimulus (p = 0.02) and had a larger rheobase (p = 0.02) than median axons, but were otherwise comparable. The superficial radial axons were "fanned-in" compared to median, and to a lesser degree ulnar axons, with greater resting I/V slope. Mathematical modelling of the radial and median sensory axons suggested that a 15.1% reduction in conductances between nodal and internodal compartments accounted for 82% of this discrepancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The excitability parameters of motor and sensory axons are most comparable between median and ulnar nerves.
SIGNIFICANCE: The present study demonstrates the feasibility of, and provides normative data for, axonal excitability recordings of the radial and ulnar nerves. We suggest the use of ulnar recordings as an alternative to the median nerve in the setting of compressive neuropathy at the wrist.