MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8

Медицинская библиотека · International ophthalmology · 2017

Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.

Mukhtar Sabrina, Ambati Balamurali K

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology and prevalence, rates of progression, difference between adult and pediatric populations, and therapeutic approaches to pediatric keratoconus from documented literature.

METHODS

A literature search was done on PubMed using key words including pediatric keratoconus, children with keratoconus, adult keratoconus, penetrating keratoplasty, corneal cross-linking and intracorneal ring segments. The literature was reviewed and reported to explore the key epidemiological differences between the pediatric and adult population with regards to presentation and treatment options.

RESULTS

Pediatric keratoconus is more aggressive than adult keratoconus, which has been explained by structural differences in the cornea between both populations. High rates of progression were documented in pediatric populations. While corneal collagen cross-linking, intracorneal ring segments and penetrating keratoplasties have been used as therapies in the pediatric population, the literature overwhelmingly shows higher rates of failure and progression despite these measures as compared to adults.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric keratoconus is more aggressive than adult keratoconus, and current therapies used in adults may not be sufficient for the pediatric population.

Для цитирования: Mukhtar Sabrina, Ambati Balamurali K. Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.. International ophthalmology. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.