Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022
Evaluation of Discordant Results Between FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Conventional Testing in Pediatric Patients: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ekambaram Maheswari, Nabower Aleisha, Rajbhandari Prabi, Eisenberg Jaclyn, Goodrich Nathaniel, Ampofo Krow, Gollehon Nathan S, Martin Kimberly C, Lyden Elizabeth, Snowden Jessica
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel (MEP) has an 11% false-positive and 2.2% false-negative rate compared with conventional testing. We describe clinical characteristics, treatment decisions, and outcomes in children with discordant results between MEP and conventional testing.
METHODS: We conducted a multisite review of patients ≤ 18 years with suspected central nervous system infection and positive results by MEP or conventional testing (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] culture, herpes simplex virus [HSV] polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and enterovirus [EV] PCR). Descriptive results are provided for patients with discordant results. Comparison between group 1 (MEP and CSF culture positive) and group 2 (MEP positive, CSF culture negative, or showing a different pathogen) was made by Mann-Whitney test for continuous and Fisher's test for categorical variables.
RESULTS: A total of 355 patients had at least one pathogen identified. More than half of patients with bacterial pathogens identified that are included in the MEP had discordant results (30/52; 58%). There were 28 samples with bacterial pathogen identified on MEP only, 1 with different bacterial pathogens on MEP and culture, and 1 with Escherichia coli identified on CSF culture only. Patients in group 1 were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis, elevated CSF protein, and decreased CSF glucose than group 2 (P < .05). Two patients were HSV positive by MEP while HSV negative by PCR. Ten patients had discordant results between MEP and EV PCR.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordant results between MEP and conventional testing are common. Treatment decisions based on a positive MEP should be made in the appropriate clinical context.
METHODS: We conducted a multisite review of patients ≤ 18 years with suspected central nervous system infection and positive results by MEP or conventional testing (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] culture, herpes simplex virus [HSV] polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and enterovirus [EV] PCR). Descriptive results are provided for patients with discordant results. Comparison between group 1 (MEP and CSF culture positive) and group 2 (MEP positive, CSF culture negative, or showing a different pathogen) was made by Mann-Whitney test for continuous and Fisher's test for categorical variables.
RESULTS: A total of 355 patients had at least one pathogen identified. More than half of patients with bacterial pathogens identified that are included in the MEP had discordant results (30/52; 58%). There were 28 samples with bacterial pathogen identified on MEP only, 1 with different bacterial pathogens on MEP and culture, and 1 with Escherichia coli identified on CSF culture only. Patients in group 1 were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis, elevated CSF protein, and decreased CSF glucose than group 2 (P < .05). Two patients were HSV positive by MEP while HSV negative by PCR. Ten patients had discordant results between MEP and EV PCR.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordant results between MEP and conventional testing are common. Treatment decisions based on a positive MEP should be made in the appropriate clinical context.