MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Indian pediatrics · 2021

Comparison of a Voiding Diary With Clinical Management Tool As an Outpatient Screening Tool for Childhood Functional Voiding Disorders.

Sajith Surendran, Patnaik Saroj Kumar, Kanitkar Madhuri

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the agreement of questionnaire-based assessment with voiding diary for differentiating primary mono-symptomatic nocturnal enuresis from voiding disorder in children.

METHOD: Children 5-12 years old with bedwetting after exclusion of secondary enuresis were enrolled and parents filled a clinical management tool (CMT) questionnaire and a 48-hours voiding diary. Point prevalence and agreement of classification as primary mono-symptomatic nocturnal enuresis or voiding disorder were compared.

RESULTS

Of 1276 children screened, 143 (11.2%) reported enuresis. Of 100 (82 males) children finally analyzed, constipation and positive family history occurred in 14% and 37%, respectively. Questionnaire-based assessment and voiding diary identified 65% and 71%, respectively as voiding disorder [Cohen's kappa 0.542 (95%CI: 0.367-0.717)]. Discordance of classification was noted in 20%. Voiding diary identified additional 7% cases of voiding disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

While CMT and voiding diary have moderate agreement, voiding diary should be used for cases screened negative by a questionnaire-based tool.

Для цитирования: Sajith Surendran, Patnaik Saroj Kumar, Kanitkar Madhuri. Comparison of a Voiding Diary With Clinical Management Tool As an Outpatient Screening Tool for Childhood Functional Voiding Disorders.. Indian pediatrics. 2021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.