Long-term outcomes of hemi-automated lamellar keratoplasty.
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE
To describe long-term outcomes of hemi-automated lamellar keratoplasty (HALK).
BACKGROUND
HALK is a hybrid anterior lamellar keratoplasty technique for corneas with anterior to mid-stromal scars and topographical irregularities.
DESIGN
Prospective interventional case series.
PARTICIPANTS
Thirty-five eyes of 35 consecutive patients undergoing HALK at a single tertiary referral centre from 2007 to 2016.
METHODS
Patients were followed up for a mean period of 61.4 ± 29.2 months.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder, endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), graft survival and complications were analysed.
RESULTS
The most common indications for HALK were scars because of contact lens associated infectious keratitis (29%), unknown origin (26%) or corneal dystrophies (14%). Five patients had a previous keratoplasty (n = 4; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, n = 1). Two HALKs failed at 22 and 32 months follow-up. No graft rejections occurred. UCVA improved from 0.91 ± 0.31 to 0.58 ± 0.35 and BSCVA from 0.66 ± 0.30 to 0.21 ± 0.20 logMAR (P < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Astigmatism (P = 0.2), SE (P = 0.8) and ECD (P = 0.4) did not change significantly during follow-up. CCT increased from 490 to 560 μm (P = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival for all HALK cases was 90.6 (95% confidence interval 82.6-98.5) months with a survival probability of 96% at 12 months and 92% at 3, 5 and 7 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: HALK provides excellent graft survival in primary cases and in patients with prior keratoplasty as well as significant improvement in visual acuity with low complication rates.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.