Cancer cytopathology · 2013
Cervista HPV assays for fine-needle aspiration specimens are a valid option for human papillomavirus testing in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Ming, Khanna Abha, Dhillon Jasreman, Patel Shobha J, Feng Jie, Williams Michelle D, Bell Diana M, Gong Yun, Katz Ruth L, Sturgis Erich M, Staerkel Gregg A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the validity of Cervista human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in head and neck fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens from patients with head and neck squamous carcinomas and to verify that the Cervista assay in FNA specimens is a valid option for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively retrieved 64 head and neck FNA specimens from patients who had head and neck squamous carcinoma. The specimens were tested for HPV types 16 and 18 (HPV16/18) and for high-risk (HR) HPV DNA using the Cervista HPV16/18 and HPV HR assays, respectively. The results from those assays were compared with the results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV assays in the same tissues and with the results from HPV in situ hybridization assays/p16 immunostaining in the corresponding primary tumors.
RESULTS: In total, 64 FNA specimens were analyzed. The Cervista HPV16/18 and/or HPV HR assays were positive in 48 of 64 specimens (75%), and there was a predominance of HPV16 (42 of 48 specimens; 88%). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based test results, overall agreement with Cervista assay results was 96% (47 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.883). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based HPV16/18 genotyping results, overall agreement with the Cervista HPV16/18 results was 94% (46 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.847). In the 36 primary carcinoma specimens that had valid HPV in situ hybridization/p16 immunostaining results, overall agreement with the Cervista assay results was 92% (33 of 36 specimens; κ = 0.679).
CONCLUSIONS: Cervista HPV16/18 and Cervista HPV HR testing of head and neck FNA specimens is a valid option for determining HPV16/18 status in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively retrieved 64 head and neck FNA specimens from patients who had head and neck squamous carcinoma. The specimens were tested for HPV types 16 and 18 (HPV16/18) and for high-risk (HR) HPV DNA using the Cervista HPV16/18 and HPV HR assays, respectively. The results from those assays were compared with the results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV assays in the same tissues and with the results from HPV in situ hybridization assays/p16 immunostaining in the corresponding primary tumors.
RESULTS: In total, 64 FNA specimens were analyzed. The Cervista HPV16/18 and/or HPV HR assays were positive in 48 of 64 specimens (75%), and there was a predominance of HPV16 (42 of 48 specimens; 88%). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based test results, overall agreement with Cervista assay results was 96% (47 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.883). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based HPV16/18 genotyping results, overall agreement with the Cervista HPV16/18 results was 94% (46 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.847). In the 36 primary carcinoma specimens that had valid HPV in situ hybridization/p16 immunostaining results, overall agreement with the Cervista assay results was 92% (33 of 36 specimens; κ = 0.679).
CONCLUSIONS: Cervista HPV16/18 and Cervista HPV HR testing of head and neck FNA specimens is a valid option for determining HPV16/18 status in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma.