Clinical oral implants research · 2026
Prevalence and Risk Indicators of Peri-Implant Diseases in China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Xinbo, Wang Feng, He Dongning, Wang Jinming, Wu Runfa, Zhang Dayong, Fan Qin, Xia Haibin, Qu Zhe, Wu Yiqun
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implant diseases in a randomly selected Chinese population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 819 patients with 1412 implants from eight university hospital databases were clinically and radiographically evaluated along with medical records to assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases. Potential risk/protective indicators were explored using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: According to the 2017 EFP/AAP World Workshop case definitions, the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis at the subject and implant level was 36.4% and 31.3%, respectively. The prevalence of peri-implantitis at the subject and implant level was 4% and 3.3%, respectively. History of periodontitis and heavy smoking were identified as risk indicators for peri-implantitis in the final model.
CONCLUSION: In this randomly selected diverse patient sample within China, the prevalence of peri-implant diseases was moderately high (40.4%) after a mean follow-up duration of 6.65 ± 1.18 years post loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 819 patients with 1412 implants from eight university hospital databases were clinically and radiographically evaluated along with medical records to assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases. Potential risk/protective indicators were explored using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: According to the 2017 EFP/AAP World Workshop case definitions, the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis at the subject and implant level was 36.4% and 31.3%, respectively. The prevalence of peri-implantitis at the subject and implant level was 4% and 3.3%, respectively. History of periodontitis and heavy smoking were identified as risk indicators for peri-implantitis in the final model.
CONCLUSION: In this randomly selected diverse patient sample within China, the prevalence of peri-implant diseases was moderately high (40.4%) after a mean follow-up duration of 6.65 ± 1.18 years post loading.