Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025
ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified in children aged 4-18 years.
СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Groen Jip, Gordon Morris, Chogle Ashish, Benninga Marc, Borlack Rachel, Borrelli Osvaldo, Darbari Anil, Dolinsek Jernej, Khlevner Julie, Di Lorenzo Carlo, Person Hannibal, Sanghavi Rinarani, Snyder Julie, Thapar Nikhil, Vlieger Arine, Sinopoulou Vasiliki, Tabbers Merit, Saps Miguel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Abdominal pain related disorders of gut-brain interaction (AP-DGBIs) such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified (FAP) are common conditions in children, significantly impacting quality of life. This treatment guideline for IBS and FAP in children of 4-18 years is a collaborative effort of the European and North American Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN). We aim to comprehensively review the current evidence on treatment options and offer evidence-based recommendations with utility across all treatment settings worldwide, as well as to provide methodological directions for future research.
METHODS: The guideline development followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach, which is in accordance with the GRADE handbook and supported by the World Health Organization. The Guideline Development Group (GDG) comprised clinical experts, representing ESPGHAN, NASPGHAN, and Cochrane. Individual members have put forward a final consensus list of treatment options, which were then translated into "patient, intervention, comparison, outcome" (PICO) format options. Prospective agreement on decision thresholds for efficacy and safety outcomes was reached through a Delphi process among the GDG to support GRADEing of the literature. Consensus voting was used to finalize recommendations, and a treatment algorithm was developed.
RESULTS: Systematic literature searches for this output identified 86 original randomized controlled trials assessing treatment of IBS and FAP. Consensus was reached for 25 GRADEd recommendations. Ten best practice statements were formulated, and guidance for future research methodology was proposed.
CONCLUSION: This guideline represents the first collaborative output of ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN on treatment options for AP-DGBIs. Systematic review of the evidence has exposed major evidence gaps for the treatment of these disorders and incentivizes large pediatric trials, particularly on treatment options for which, to date, no evidence exists.
METHODS: The guideline development followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach, which is in accordance with the GRADE handbook and supported by the World Health Organization. The Guideline Development Group (GDG) comprised clinical experts, representing ESPGHAN, NASPGHAN, and Cochrane. Individual members have put forward a final consensus list of treatment options, which were then translated into "patient, intervention, comparison, outcome" (PICO) format options. Prospective agreement on decision thresholds for efficacy and safety outcomes was reached through a Delphi process among the GDG to support GRADEing of the literature. Consensus voting was used to finalize recommendations, and a treatment algorithm was developed.
RESULTS: Systematic literature searches for this output identified 86 original randomized controlled trials assessing treatment of IBS and FAP. Consensus was reached for 25 GRADEd recommendations. Ten best practice statements were formulated, and guidance for future research methodology was proposed.
CONCLUSION: This guideline represents the first collaborative output of ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN on treatment options for AP-DGBIs. Systematic review of the evidence has exposed major evidence gaps for the treatment of these disorders and incentivizes large pediatric trials, particularly on treatment options for which, to date, no evidence exists.