World neurosurgery · 2024
Neuroendoscopic versus Craniotomy Approach in Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haseeb Abdul, Shafique Muhammad Ashir, Mustafa Muhammad Saqlain, Singh Ajeet, Iftikhar Sadaf, Rangwala Burhanuddin Sohail, Waggan Anzah Imtiaz, Fadlalla Ahmad Tagwa Kalool, Raja Sandesh, Raja Adarsh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious medical condition associated with high mortality and disability rates. Surgical interventions, including neuroendoscopic surgery (NES) and craniotomy, are employed to manage ICH and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of NES versus craniotomy in treating ICH.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing NES with craniotomy for ICH. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary or secondary results from randomized controlled trials or observational studies for confirmed supratentorial ICH. Data were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using appropriate tools. Statistical analysis was performed using meta-analysis software.
RESULTS: The analysis included 26studies (N = 3237 patients). NES was associated with significantly lower mortality compared with craniotomy (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 0.60, P < 0.00001). Hematoma evacuation rates were higher with NES (standardized mean difference 1.505, 95% CI 0.835 to 2.160, P < 0.00001). NES also showed better functional outcomes (odds ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.17, P = 0.0002) and reduced blood loss (standardized mean difference -3.06, 95% CI -3.979 to -2.141, P = 0.000). Additionally, NES was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays, shorter operative times, and fewer complications such as infection and rebleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: NES is a promising alternative to craniotomy for treating ICH, offering advantages in terms of reduced mortality, improved functional outcomes, and fewer complications. Future studies should explore advances in neuroendoscopic techniques to optimize patient outcomes further.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing NES with craniotomy for ICH. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary or secondary results from randomized controlled trials or observational studies for confirmed supratentorial ICH. Data were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using appropriate tools. Statistical analysis was performed using meta-analysis software.
RESULTS: The analysis included 26studies (N = 3237 patients). NES was associated with significantly lower mortality compared with craniotomy (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 0.60, P < 0.00001). Hematoma evacuation rates were higher with NES (standardized mean difference 1.505, 95% CI 0.835 to 2.160, P < 0.00001). NES also showed better functional outcomes (odds ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.17, P = 0.0002) and reduced blood loss (standardized mean difference -3.06, 95% CI -3.979 to -2.141, P = 0.000). Additionally, NES was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays, shorter operative times, and fewer complications such as infection and rebleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: NES is a promising alternative to craniotomy for treating ICH, offering advantages in terms of reduced mortality, improved functional outcomes, and fewer complications. Future studies should explore advances in neuroendoscopic techniques to optimize patient outcomes further.