MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.06.007

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2009

Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute appendicitis.

Unlü C, de Castro S M M, Tuynman J B, Wüst A F, Steller E Ph, van Wagensveld B A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate the impact of selective imaging on clinical management of patients who present with symptoms suggesting acute appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

During a two-and-half year period, 941 consecutive patients with right lower quadrant pain were analyzed. Patients who underwent selective imaging were compared to those treated without further imaging.

RESULTS

In 650 (69%) patients with right lower quadrant pain, diagnosis was based on medical history, physical and laboratory examination only. The diagnostic accuracy was 84%. Another 291 patients (31%) underwent selective imaging reaching a diagnostic accuracy of 71%. Ultrasound was conducted in 277 patients (sensitivity: 59%; specificity: 91%). CT scan was conducted in 43 patients (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 95%).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that, in the majority of patients, appendicitis acuta can be diagnosed without the aid of imaging studies. In all these cases, high diagnostic accuracy rates and low morbidity rates were achieved. In all the other cases when clinical diagnosis is uncertain, further evaluation should include imaging. In our series ultrasound is of limited value; CT scan or diagnostic laparoscopy seems superior.

Для цитирования: Unlü C, de Castro S M M, Tuynman J B, Wüst A F, Steller E Ph, van Wagensveld B A. Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute appendicitis.. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.06.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.