MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.047

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology · 2008

Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.

Fraunfelder Frederick W

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy on superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK).

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

METHODS

In this clinical practice case series, the effects of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy on SLK were observed. Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy was performed using a Brymill E tip spray (0.013-inch aperture) with a double freeze-thaw technique. All subjects were outpatients who had local anesthesia with a single drop of topical proparacaine. The main outcome measure was the resolution of the disease process after treatment.

RESULTS

Four female patients (average age, 64 +/- 13 years) and seven eyes with SLK were treated with liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Resolution of signs and symptoms occurred within two weeks. Disease recurred in two patients and three of seven eyes, although repeat cryotherapy eradicated SLK in all cases. The repeat cryotherapy was performed at three months postoperatively. There were no adverse ocular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy appears to be an effective alternative treatment for SLK as all subjects studied achieved long-term cures. Repeat cryotherapy may be necessary in some instances and may be performed three months after the first treatment.

Для цитирования: Fraunfelder Frederick W. Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.. American journal of ophthalmology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.