DOI 10.23822/eurannaci.1764-1489.365
Allergic rhinitis management: a survey on Italian primary care pediatricians.
Аннотация
Background. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread condition. The Italian Society of Pediatric Allergology and Immunology (SIAIP) promoted an initiative to update the knowledge on AR in children and adolescents. The present survey directly addressed primary care pediatricians, thus reflecting the real-world management of AR in children and adolescents. The aim was to investigate common practice in managing AR children. Methods. A panel of experts drafted a series of questions concerning the practical management of children with AR in clinical practice. The questionnaire was administered to a large sample of primary care pediatricians (864). Results. 864 primary care pediatricians participated to the survey. Each pediatrician on average follows 94 children with AR; globally 81,231 children. More than 70% of participants follow ARIA guidelines. Accordingly, 42% of children have mild AR and 58% moderate/severe. Asthma, conjunctivitis and adenoid hypertrophy are the most common comorbidity. Most pediatricians autonomously follow their patients. The intensity of treatment (use of medication) is directly proportional to the symptom severity. Intranasal corticosteroids are the most common medication used followed by oral antihistamines and nasal lavages (with hypertonic or isotonic solution). Up to 20% of participants prescribe the fixed association topical corticosteroids plus antihistamine. Conclusions. The present survey demonstrated that Italian primary care pediatricians accomplish ARIA guidelines and adapt treatment on the basis of the intensity of symptoms. Corticosteroids and antihistamines are the most common prescribed medications. Nasal lavages are also popular.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.