Ophthalmology · 2002
Planning low vision services in India : a population-based perspective.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dandona Rakhi, Dandona Lalit, Srinivas Marmamula, Giridhar Pyda, Nutheti Rishita, Rao Gullapalli N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and causes of low vision in a population in southern India for planning low vision services.
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,293 persons of all ages from 94 clusters representative of the population of the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.
METHODS: The participants underwent a detailed eye examination, including measurement of visual acuity with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution charts, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and stereoscopic dilated fundus evaluation. Automated threshold visual fields and slit-lamp and fundus photography were done when indicated using predefined criteria.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Low vision was defined as permanent visual impairment that was not correctable with refractive error correction or surgical intervention. The participants with best-corrected distance visual acuity <6/18 to perception of light or central visual field <10 degrees because of an untreatable cause in both eyes were considered as having low vision.
RESULTS: Low vision was present in 144 participants, an age, gender, and urban-rural distribution adjusted prevalence of 1.05% (95% confidence interval, 0.82%-1.28%). The most frequent causes of low vision included retinal diseases (35.2%), amblyopia (25.7%), optic atrophy (14.3%), glaucoma (11.4%), and corneal diseases (8.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that the prevalence of low vision was significantly higher with increasing age, and there was a trend for higher prevalence with decreasing socioeconomic status. Extrapolating these data to the estimated 1014 million population of India in the year 2000, 10.6 (95% confidence interval, 8.4-12.8) million people would have low vision.
CONCLUSIONS: These data imply that there is a significant burden of low vision in this population, suggesting the need for low vision services.
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,293 persons of all ages from 94 clusters representative of the population of the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.
METHODS: The participants underwent a detailed eye examination, including measurement of visual acuity with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution charts, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and stereoscopic dilated fundus evaluation. Automated threshold visual fields and slit-lamp and fundus photography were done when indicated using predefined criteria.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Low vision was defined as permanent visual impairment that was not correctable with refractive error correction or surgical intervention. The participants with best-corrected distance visual acuity <6/18 to perception of light or central visual field <10 degrees because of an untreatable cause in both eyes were considered as having low vision.
RESULTS: Low vision was present in 144 participants, an age, gender, and urban-rural distribution adjusted prevalence of 1.05% (95% confidence interval, 0.82%-1.28%). The most frequent causes of low vision included retinal diseases (35.2%), amblyopia (25.7%), optic atrophy (14.3%), glaucoma (11.4%), and corneal diseases (8.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that the prevalence of low vision was significantly higher with increasing age, and there was a trend for higher prevalence with decreasing socioeconomic status. Extrapolating these data to the estimated 1014 million population of India in the year 2000, 10.6 (95% confidence interval, 8.4-12.8) million people would have low vision.
CONCLUSIONS: These data imply that there is a significant burden of low vision in this population, suggesting the need for low vision services.