American journal of ophthalmology · 2016
Age-specific Incidence and Prevalence of Keratoconus: A Nationwide Registration Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Godefrooij Daniel A, de Wit G Ardine, Uiterwaal Cuno S, Imhof Saskia M, Wisse Robert P L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus in the modern era of diagnostics.
DESIGN: Epidemiologic study.
PARTICIPANTS: Total of 4.4 million patients from a mandatory health insurance database.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the largest health insurance provider in the Netherlands. Patients aged 10-40 years were defined as the relevant age category for newly diagnosed keratoconus and the annual incidence of newly diagnosed keratoconus was determined. The prevalence of keratoconus was estimated based on the annual incidence, mean age at diagnosis, and average life expectancy. Main outcome measure was the annual incidence and prevalence of keratoconus.
RESULTS: The annual incidence of keratoconus was 1:7500 in the relevant age category (13.3 cases per 100 000, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.6-15.2) and the estimated prevalence of keratoconus in the general population was 1:375 (265 cases per 100 000, 95% CI: 260-270). These values are 5-fold to 10-fold higher than previously reported values in population studies. The mean age at diagnosis was 28.3 years and 60.6% of diagnosed patients were male.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the annual incidence and the prevalence of keratoconus were 5-fold to 10-fold higher than previously reported.
DESIGN: Epidemiologic study.
PARTICIPANTS: Total of 4.4 million patients from a mandatory health insurance database.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the largest health insurance provider in the Netherlands. Patients aged 10-40 years were defined as the relevant age category for newly diagnosed keratoconus and the annual incidence of newly diagnosed keratoconus was determined. The prevalence of keratoconus was estimated based on the annual incidence, mean age at diagnosis, and average life expectancy. Main outcome measure was the annual incidence and prevalence of keratoconus.
RESULTS: The annual incidence of keratoconus was 1:7500 in the relevant age category (13.3 cases per 100 000, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.6-15.2) and the estimated prevalence of keratoconus in the general population was 1:375 (265 cases per 100 000, 95% CI: 260-270). These values are 5-fold to 10-fold higher than previously reported values in population studies. The mean age at diagnosis was 28.3 years and 60.6% of diagnosed patients were male.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the annual incidence and the prevalence of keratoconus were 5-fold to 10-fold higher than previously reported.