MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000486701

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018

Longitudinal Melanonychia: Differences in Etiology Are Associated with Patient Age at Diagnosis.

Tseng Yi-Teng, Liang Cher-Wei, Liau Jau-Yu, Chang Koping, Tseng Yu-Hsian, Chen Jau-Shiuh, Liao Yi-Hua

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal melanonychia (LM) may occur as a result of nail apparatus melanoma. Knowledge of etiology plays an important role in the management of LM.

OBJECTIVES

The study is aimed to compare the diagnosis of LM in different age groups.

METHODS

We collected 63 cases (45 adults and 18 children) with LM who underwent nail matrix biopsy or excision in a 21-year cohort and assessed their clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

Melanomas in adults and children were 40% and none, while nevi accounted for 15.6% in adults and 94.4% in children. There was a statistically significant difference between the average age at diagnosis for melanoma (54.5 ± 13.3 years) and nevus (15.2 ± 18.5 years). Logistic regression related the occurrence of melanoma to older ages with a relative risk of 1.2 compared to nevus, but no cutoffs between age groups could be defined between LM-associated nevus and melanoma.

CONCLUSION

The adult group has a significantly higher risk of melanoma, while children with LM show mostly nonmelanoma etiologies. Tissue proof is more warranted in adult cases, and it is needed in selected cases of children with LM.

Для цитирования: Tseng Yi-Teng, Liang Cher-Wei, Liau Jau-Yu, Chang Koping, Tseng Yu-Hsian, Chen Jau-Shiuh, Liao Yi-Hua. Longitudinal Melanonychia: Differences in Etiology Are Associated with Patient Age at Diagnosis.. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2018. DOI: 10.1159/000486701.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.