MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00223

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2019

Nineteen Years of Single Institute Experiences with Sorin Bicarbon Prosthesis.

Van Hung Dung

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We want to share our experience of Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis (SBP) after 19 years follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 1377 patients who had replaced with SBP from May 1998 to December 2008 at Ho Chi Minh Heart Institute, Viet Nam.

RESULTS

Male patients was 42%, mean age was 40.2 ± 11.8 years. Atrial fibrillation was 43.5%. The main cause of valvular disease was rheumatic fever (89.8%). Isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR): 54% (744), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR): 18% (247), double valve replacement (DVR): 26% (359), and 27 AVR plus mitral repair. 30-day mortality for all was 1.5%. Mean time of follow-up was 153 ± 53.1 months with total follow-up time was 17563 patients-years. 2.5% lost of follow-up. Late death was 77 cases. Redo for all causes was 59 cases. 19 years survival was 88.8 ± 1.8%. 19 years freedom of redo was 76.4 ± 4.7%. Linearized rate of all valve thrombosis, embolism, severe bleeding, endocarditis, and pannus were 0.31%, 0.28%, 0.267%, 0.068%, and 0.165% patient-years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SBP had shown very good results in long term and still have a reliable mechanical valve.

Для цитирования: Van Hung Dung. Nineteen Years of Single Institute Experiences with Sorin Bicarbon Prosthesis.. Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia. 2019. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00223.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.