DOI 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.06.005
Nutritional status of visceral leishmaniasis patients: A comparative cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence and identify the determinants of nutritional status in Leishmaniasis patients and their family members.
METHODS
A comparative cross-sectional study design was implemented among patients visiting the Kala-azar treatments centers in Amhara region. Systematic sampling technique was used to select the Kala-azar patients and simple random sampling technique was used to select the family members. Data were collected using interview, measuring anthropometric indicators and collecting the stool and blood samples. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the proportion of malnutrition among the Kala-azar patients and their family members. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of malnutrition. 762 visceral leishmaniasis patients and 2287 family members were included.
RESULTS
The prevalence of underweight among visceral leishmaniasis patients was 82% [95% CI: 79%-85%], the prevalence of underweight among visceral leishmaniasis family members was 48.3% [95% CI: 46%-50%]. The mean hemoglobin concentration of visceral leishmaniasis patients was 9.46 g/dl and the mean hemoglobin concentration of visceral leishmaniasis patients' family members was 11.46 g/dl. The nutritional status of kala-azar patients was affected by intestinal parasite (AOR: 15.65 [95% CI; 779-31.44]), male sex (AOR: 2.15 [95%CI; 1.12-4.12]), literacy (AOR: 0.4 [AOR; 0.2-0.84]), urban residence (AOR: 0.46 [95%; 0.23-0.92]), income (AOR: 3.44 [95% CI; 1.76-6.74]).
CONCLUSION
The visceral leishmaniasis treatments guideline should consider supplying nutrients including iron as part of the curative intervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.