DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.032
Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral skull base lesions.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
With the use of multiple endoscopic endonasal surgical corridors, extended endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEEAs) are now being used to treat a wide range of ventral skull base lesions. Our aim was to present our experience with EEEAs to the ventral skull base lesions.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
The study group consisted of 106 patients (57 men and 49 women) who underwent surgery for skull base lesions using EEEAs from 2010 to 2017. The EEEA was most commonly used for giant pituitary macroadenomas, sinonasal malignancies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, and fibro-osseous lesions. Four different approaches were used including transtuberculum-transplanum, transethmoidal-transcribriform, transclival, and transmaxillary-transpterygoidal.
RESULTS
The overall gross total resection (GTR) rate for these diverse pathologies was 75.0% in 88 patients (excluding the operations performed for non-neoplastic pathologies). GTR was achieved in 100%, 77.8%, 75%, 75%, 72.2%, 62.5%, 60% of fibro-osseous lesions, giant/large pitutary adenomas, meningiomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, sinonasal malignancies, craniopharyngiomas, and chordomas, respectively. The overall rate of improvement in visual fields was 86%. The overall rate of CSF leak was 8.4%. Other surgical complications included intracerebral hematoma and tension pneumocephalus. The mortality rate was 0.9%.
CONCLUSION
EEEA is a safe, well-tolerated and effective surgical treatment modality in the management of ventral skull base lesions. It should be performed with close interdisciplinary collaboration. Appropriate case selection is mandatory. However, despite improved reconstruction techniques, postoperative CSF leakage still remains a challenge.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.