MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0378-6323.25637

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology · 2006

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in community-acquired primary pyoderma.

Patil Rahul, Baveja Sujata, Nataraj Gita, Khopkar Uday

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although prevalence of MRSA strains is reported to be increasing, there are no studies of their prevalence in community-acquired primary pyodermas in western India.

AIMS: This study aimed at determining the prevalence of MRSA infection in community-acquired primary pyodermas.

METHODS

Open, prospective survey carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with primary pyoderma, visiting the dermatology outpatient, were studied clinically and microbiologically. Sensitivity testing was done for vancomycin, sisomycin, gentamicin, framycetin, erythromycin, methicillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, penicillin G and ciprofloxacin. Phage typing was done for MRSA positive strains.

RESULTS

The culture positivity rate was 83.7%. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in all cases except two. Barring one, all strains of Staphylococcus were sensitive to methicillin.

CONCLUSIONS

Methicillin resistance is uncommon in community-acquired primary pyodermas in Mumbai. Treatment with antibacterials active against MRSA is probably unwarranted for community-acquired primary pyodermas.

Для цитирования: Patil Rahul, Baveja Sujata, Nataraj Gita, Khopkar Uday. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in community-acquired primary pyoderma.. Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. 2006. DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.25637.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.