Spastic co-contraction, rather that spasticity, is associated with impaired active function in adults with acquired brain injury: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the adverse consequences of spasticity and spastic co-contraction of elbow flexors on motor impairment and upper limb functional limitation.

DESIGN

A pilot case-controlled prospective observational study.

SUBJECTS: Ten brain-injured adults, and 10 healthy controls.

METHODS

The co-contraction index was computed from electromyographic recordings of elbow flexors during sub-maximal (25% Maximal Voluntary Contraction) isometric elbow extension. Spasticity was assessed with the Tardieu scale, upper limb limitation using a goniometer during active elbow extension, motor selectivity with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper limb, and motor function with the Action Research Arm Test.

RESULTS

Greater co-contraction occurred in patients with brain injury compared with controls. In contrast to spasticity, strong associations were found between the co-contraction index, the limitation of active elbow extension, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and the Action Research Arm Test.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that spastic co-contraction rather than spasticity is an important factor in altered upper limb motricity in subjects with brain injury, leading to abnormal restricting arm movement patterns in subjects with more severe motor impairment. Practical applications directly concern the pre- and post-therapeutic evaluation of treatments aimed at improving motor skills in subjects with brain injury.