MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80107-7

Медицинская библиотека · Public health · 1996

Urinary schistosomiasis: options for control within endemic rural communities: a case study in south-west Nigeria.

Onayade A A, Abayomi I O, Fabiyi A K

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A preliminary investigation was conducted into factors that may bring about control of morbidity due to endemic urinary schistosomiasis in rural communities. A Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Beliefs (KAPB) study was conducted among primary schoolchildren (those with more than four years elementary education) in Ogbagba village, Osun State, Nigeria, from October 1990 to December 1993, to ascertain their understanding of urinary schistosomiasis. The study further assessed the potential of subjective haematuria, i.e. asking children with haematuria in the recent past to so indicate, in detecting urinary schistosomiasis. It was established that subjective haematuria is both sensitive and specific for detecting urinary schistosomiasis in endemic communities. The study also established that subjective haematuria offers a valid, easy to recognize target for morbidity control in endemic situation. It is proposed that with appropriate health education; availability of safe, effective, easy-to-administer drugs, such as praziquantel, morbidity control of urinary schistosomiasis is feasible within the primary health care system with the lower cadre health worker or even a volunteer village health worker (VVHW) at the centre of the control effort.

Для цитирования: Onayade A A, Abayomi I O, Fabiyi A K. Urinary schistosomiasis: options for control within endemic rural communities: a case study in south-west Nigeria.. Public health. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80107-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.