Journal of pain and symptom management · 2014
Relationship between symptom burden, distress, and sense of dignity in terminally ill cancer patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oechsle Karin, Wais Marie Carlotta, Vehling Sigrun, Bokemeyer Carsten, Mehnert Anja
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Maintaining a sense of dignity in terminally ill patients and enabling a dignified dying are important aims of palliative care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of symptom burden, distress, overall condition, and individual patient characteristics on self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 61 patients were recruited through a palliative care inpatient ward within 48 hours after admission. Patients completed the Patient Dignity Inventory, a modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, and a single-item scale rating subjective of overall condition. Sociodemographic parameters and performance status were taken from the patients' records.
RESULTS: Dignity total score correlated highest with lack of energy (P<0.001), anxiety (P<0.001), sadness (P=0.002), pain (P=0.009), shortness of breath (P=0.019), irritability (P=0.023), thirst (P=0.029), and tiredness (P=0.041). Psychological symptoms showed more consistent associations with the different dignity dimensions than physical symptoms except for the dependency dimension. Psychological distress correlated with all dignity dimensions: symptom distress (P<0.001), existential distress (P<0.001), dependency (P=0.020), peace of mind (P<0.001), and social support (P=0.024). Overall condition was significantly associated with existential distress (P=0.013), but not with symptom distress, dependency, peace of mind, or social support. Performance status showed significant association with dependency (P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients is significantly associated with physical as well as psychological symptoms, distress, overall condition, performance status, and comorbidities. Knowledge of these specific interactions is essential for adequate, comprehensive palliative care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of symptom burden, distress, overall condition, and individual patient characteristics on self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 61 patients were recruited through a palliative care inpatient ward within 48 hours after admission. Patients completed the Patient Dignity Inventory, a modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, and a single-item scale rating subjective of overall condition. Sociodemographic parameters and performance status were taken from the patients' records.
RESULTS: Dignity total score correlated highest with lack of energy (P<0.001), anxiety (P<0.001), sadness (P=0.002), pain (P=0.009), shortness of breath (P=0.019), irritability (P=0.023), thirst (P=0.029), and tiredness (P=0.041). Psychological symptoms showed more consistent associations with the different dignity dimensions than physical symptoms except for the dependency dimension. Psychological distress correlated with all dignity dimensions: symptom distress (P<0.001), existential distress (P<0.001), dependency (P=0.020), peace of mind (P<0.001), and social support (P=0.024). Overall condition was significantly associated with existential distress (P=0.013), but not with symptom distress, dependency, peace of mind, or social support. Performance status showed significant association with dependency (P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients is significantly associated with physical as well as psychological symptoms, distress, overall condition, performance status, and comorbidities. Knowledge of these specific interactions is essential for adequate, comprehensive palliative care.