MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02226.x

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical oral implants research · 2011

The use of onplants and implants in children with severe oligodontia: a retrospective evaluation.

Heuberer Simone, Dvorak Gabriella, Zauza Konstantin, Watzek Georg

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a stable treatment concept for the oral rehabilitation of children with severe oligodontia. The treatment is intended to solve a specific problem caused by limited skeletal growth, multiple congenital missing teeth, underdeveloped bone volume and young age.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A surgical/prosthodontic approach was chosen for six patients with subtotal edentulism despite their young age. To support removable dentures the maxilla was treated with onplants (OnPlant), whereas dental rootform implants (NobelReplace, Nobel Biocare) were placed in the mandible.

RESULTS

Eight onplants were placed in the hard palate of four patients for rehabilitating the maxilla and eight dental rootform implants were placed interforaminally in three patients to rehabilitate the mandible. While none of the rootform implants was lost, one onplant was lost and replaced with a stable outcome. The mean follow-up time of the onplants was 5 (±1) years vs. 3 (±2) years for the rootform implants.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation showed the treatment concept described to ensure stable oral rehabilitation and recovery of the stomatognathic system even during the juvenile growth period.

Для цитирования: Heuberer Simone, Dvorak Gabriella, Zauza Konstantin, Watzek Georg. The use of onplants and implants in children with severe oligodontia: a retrospective evaluation.. Clinical oral implants research. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02226.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.