MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jcpp.13811

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023

A commentary on Perlstein et al. (2023): the past and future of treating youth with limited prosocial emotions.

Frick Paul J

СтатьяКомментарийПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Perlstein, Fair, Hong, and Waller (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2023) meta-analysis provides a critically important summary of the research on the treatment of children and adolescents with elevated callous-unemotional (CU) traits, 10 years after they were added to diagnostic criteria in the "with Limited Prosocial Emotions" specifier for conduct disorder. Their meta-analysis provides clear and convincing evidence that many treatments that reduce conduct problems in youth are also effective for children with elevated CU traits. However, their findings also indicate that CU traits are a severity indicator, in that youth high on these traits start treatment with more severe behavior problems and, despite improving with treatment, often leave treatment with more severe behavior problems. Such findings provide a clear focus for future research to adapt existing treatments to be more effective for youth with elevated CU traits. Further, the findings from the meta-analysis suggested that while treatments overall were not effective in reducing callous-unemotional traits, high-quality parenting interventions show promise for improving this outcome.

Для цитирования: Frick Paul J. A commentary on Perlstein et al. (2023): the past and future of treating youth with limited prosocial emotions.. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13811.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.