MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08820538.2016.1247176

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in ophthalmology · 2016

The Prevalence of Strabismus and Associated Risk Factors in a Southeastern Region of Brazil.

Schaal Luisa Fioravanti, Schellini Silvana Artioli, Pesci Leonardo Toledo, Galindo Alicia, Padovani Carlos Roberto, Corrente Jose Eduardo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of strabismus and associated risk factors in southeastern Brazil.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, population-based study using a systematic sample from nine municipalities in a southeastern region of Brazil composed of 1852 individuals aged ≥1 and ≤12 years old was done. Visual acuity (VA), ocular alignment, and refractive error (RE) were evaluated. Strabismic individuals (strabismus group) were compared to orthotropic individuals (orthotropic group) to analyze risk factors linked to heterotropias.

RESULTS

Prevalence of strabismus was 0.81% in this population. In the strabismus group, we found 40% with hyperopia, 6.67% with astigmatism, 3.33% with myopia, 6.67% with amblyopia, and 8.33% with moderate anisometropia. In the orthotropic group, 6.85% had hyperopia, 18.12% astigmatism, 14.82% myopia, 0.19% amblyopia, and 4.37% moderate anisometropia.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of strabismus in southeastern Brazil was 0.81%. Strabismic individuals had more hyperopia. Amblyopia and moderate anisometropia were associated with strabismus.

Для цитирования: Schaal Luisa Fioravanti, Schellini Silvana Artioli, Pesci Leonardo Toledo, Galindo Alicia, Padovani Carlos Roberto, Corrente Jose Eduardo. The Prevalence of Strabismus and Associated Risk Factors in a Southeastern Region of Brazil.. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2016.1247176.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.