MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00540-015-2108-7

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of anesthesia · 2015

Challenge to pediatric anatomical variation : Can we draw the ideal line on the pediatric I-gel?

Abukawa Yukako, Hiroki Koichi, Iwakiri Hiroko, Fukada Tomoko, Ozaki Makoto

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

I-gel is a noncuff type of laryngeal airway mask. No horizontal line has yet been determined as an ideal position for pediatric sizes because of the variability in length of the oropharyngeal-laryngeal arch in children. We investigated whether there is a correlation between insertion length and patient body weight or height for the pediatric I-gel sizes from 1.5 to 2.5.

METHODS

With parental informed consent, we planned to maintain the airway of 130 children aged from 7 months to 13 years by using the I-gel device under general anesthesia. The following two parameters were evaluated: (1) distance between the teeth and the connector wing; (2) insertion length (distance from the distal end of the gastric tube to the teeth). Size selection was determined on the basis of patients' body weight. We identified the relationship between each parameter and height or weight.

RESULTS

Average insertion length became gradually longer with increasing height and weight. Spearman's R between insertion length and height or weight was 0.8. There was more correlation with height than with weight in pediatric size 2.5.

CONCLUSION

Results suggested that it is possible to draw an ideal line on the I-gel with sizes 1.5 and 2 only.

Для цитирования: Abukawa Yukako, Hiroki Koichi, Iwakiri Hiroko, Fukada Tomoko, Ozaki Makoto. Challenge to pediatric anatomical variation : Can we draw the ideal line on the pediatric I-gel?. Journal of anesthesia. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-015-2108-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.