MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s1352465815000685

Медицинская библиотека · Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy · 2015

The Maintaining Factors of Social Anxiety: A Three-Group Comparison of a Clinical Sample with Highly Socially Anxious Students and Non-Anxious Students.

Skocic Sonja, Jackson Henry, Hulbert Carol, Faber Christina

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clark and Wells' (1995) cognitive model of social anxiety (CWM) explains the maintenance of social anxiety and has been used as a guide for treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). Few studies have examined the components of the model together across different samples.

AIMS: This study had two distinct aims: to test the components of CWM and to examine how the variables of CWM may differ between clinical and non-clinical samples with varying levels of social anxiety.

METHOD: Hypothesized relationships between three groups (i.e. a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with SAD (ClinS), n = 40; socially anxious students (HSA), n = 40; and, non-anxious students (LSA), n = 40) were investigated.

RESULTS

Four out of five CWM variables tested were able to distinguish between highly socially anxious and non-anxious groups after controlling for age and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

CWM variables are able to distinguish between high and low levels of social anxiety and are uniquely related to social anxiety over depression.

Для цитирования: Skocic Sonja, Jackson Henry, Hulbert Carol, Faber Christina. The Maintaining Factors of Social Anxiety: A Three-Group Comparison of a Clinical Sample with Highly Socially Anxious Students and Non-Anxious Students.. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1017/s1352465815000685.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.