Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet · 2007
Normal measurements of extraocular muscle using computed tomography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lerdlum Sukalaya, Boonsirikamchai Piyaporn, Setsakol Ekapol
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Establish criteria for the diameters of normal extraocular muscles using computerized tomography in a Thai population.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Diameters of extraocular muscles (medial, lateral, superior complex, and inferior rectus) were calculated for 200 patients on coronal direction of screening paranasal sinuses. The effects of age and sex were also analyzed.
RESULT: Normal ranges for the diameters (mean +/- 2 SDs) of extraocular muscles were 3.7 +/- 0.9 mm for medial rectus, 3.6 +/- 1.2 mm for lateral rectus, 4.0 +/- 1.4 mm for inferior rectus and 3.8 +/- 1.4 mm for the superior group. The mean diameter of the extraocular muscles in male patients was not significantly larger than in female patients (p > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant correlation between age, diameter of each extramuscular muscle and the sum of all four muscles.
CONCLUSION: The present result may help radiologists and ophthalmologists to accurately assess enlargement of the extraocular muscles, particularly in Oriental populations.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Diameters of extraocular muscles (medial, lateral, superior complex, and inferior rectus) were calculated for 200 patients on coronal direction of screening paranasal sinuses. The effects of age and sex were also analyzed.
RESULT: Normal ranges for the diameters (mean +/- 2 SDs) of extraocular muscles were 3.7 +/- 0.9 mm for medial rectus, 3.6 +/- 1.2 mm for lateral rectus, 4.0 +/- 1.4 mm for inferior rectus and 3.8 +/- 1.4 mm for the superior group. The mean diameter of the extraocular muscles in male patients was not significantly larger than in female patients (p > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant correlation between age, diameter of each extramuscular muscle and the sum of all four muscles.
CONCLUSION: The present result may help radiologists and ophthalmologists to accurately assess enlargement of the extraocular muscles, particularly in Oriental populations.