MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2223/jped.1613

Медицинская библиотека · Jornal de pediatria · 2007

Noninvasive ventilation in children: a review.

Loh Lik Eng, Chan Yoke Hwee, Chan Irene

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children and its application in the acute and chronic setting of pediatric respiratory failure.

SOURCES: Search of pertinent articles within PubMed, Cochrane and Ovid MEDLINE databases from 1950 to 2007, using the keywords pediatrics, noninvasive ventilation and positive airway pressure.

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: There is a paucity of published data on pediatric NIV. The majority of the data available are case reports or small case series, with a number of small, randomized studies reported.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of NIV is increasingly recognized in pediatrics, there are currently still no generally accepted guidelines for its use. In the chronic setting, its use has mainly been proven in obstructive sleep apnea and respiratory failure secondary to neuromuscular disorders. It would appear that the major challenge is ensuring compliance, and this can be enforced by patient/caregiver education, use of a suitable interface, heated humidifiers and by minimizing the side effects of NIV. In the setting of acute respiratory failure, it would appear from available data that success is usually predicted by the rapidity of response. Patients placed on NIV should be monitored closely and this mode of ventilation should be reviewed if there is a lack of response within a few hours after commencement of therapy.

Для цитирования: Loh Lik Eng, Chan Yoke Hwee, Chan Irene. Noninvasive ventilation in children: a review.. Jornal de pediatria. 2007. DOI: 10.2223/jped.1613.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.