International psychogeriatrics · 2013
Progression of Alzheimer's disease during a three-year follow-up using the CERAD-NB total score: Kuopio ALSOVA study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hallikainen Ilona, Hänninen Tuomo, Fraunberg Mikael, Hongisto Kristiina, Välimäki Tarja, Hiltunen Asta, Karppi Pertti, Sivenius Juhani, Soininen Hilkka, Koivisto Anne M, ALSOVA study group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We studied the suitability of The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuropsychological Battery (CERAD-NB) total score for monitoring Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression in early-diagnosed medicated patients. We also investigated possible differences in progression between patients with very mild or mild baseline AD.
METHODS: In this three-year follow-up of 115 ALSOVA study patients with clinical dementia ratings (CDR) of very mild (0.5) or mild (1) AD, we analyzed total CERAD-NB, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory, and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores. Correlations were identified with efficacy parameters.
RESULTS: Over three years, total CERAD-NB declined significantly in both groups. Annual change rates of total CERAD-NB were also significant. Total CERAD-NB revealed annual differences in cognition between study groups, while MMSE did not. Total CERAD-NB correlated well with other cognitive and global measures, but not with NPI. For almost two years, the CDR-0.5 group maintained a higher activities of daily living than the CDR-1 group exhibited at baseline. Furthermore, the CDR-0.5 group showed milder neuropsychiatric symptoms at the end of follow-up than the CDR-1 group showed at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: The CERAD total score is a suitable and sensitive follow-up tool in longitudinal AD trials. Cognition progression rates did not significantly differ between study groups; however, patients with very mild AD at baseline had milder neuropsychiatric symptoms after long-term follow-up. This emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms at the diagnostic visit and during follow-up.
METHODS: In this three-year follow-up of 115 ALSOVA study patients with clinical dementia ratings (CDR) of very mild (0.5) or mild (1) AD, we analyzed total CERAD-NB, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory, and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores. Correlations were identified with efficacy parameters.
RESULTS: Over three years, total CERAD-NB declined significantly in both groups. Annual change rates of total CERAD-NB were also significant. Total CERAD-NB revealed annual differences in cognition between study groups, while MMSE did not. Total CERAD-NB correlated well with other cognitive and global measures, but not with NPI. For almost two years, the CDR-0.5 group maintained a higher activities of daily living than the CDR-1 group exhibited at baseline. Furthermore, the CDR-0.5 group showed milder neuropsychiatric symptoms at the end of follow-up than the CDR-1 group showed at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: The CERAD total score is a suitable and sensitive follow-up tool in longitudinal AD trials. Cognition progression rates did not significantly differ between study groups; however, patients with very mild AD at baseline had milder neuropsychiatric symptoms after long-term follow-up. This emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms at the diagnostic visit and during follow-up.