American journal of ophthalmology · 2015
Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shetty Rohit, Pahuja Natasha Kishore, Nuijts Rudy M M A, Ajani Amrita, Jayadev Chaitra, Sharma Chetna, Nagaraja Harsha
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study the effect of different protocols of collagen cross-linking on visual, refractive, and tomographic parameters in patients with progressive keratoconus.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized interventional study.
METHODS: In this study, 138 eyes of 138 patients with progressive keratoconus underwent corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL). Following detailed preoperative examination, Group I underwent conventional cross-linking (36 patients, 3 mW/cm(2) for 30 min); Group II (36 patients, 9 mW/cm(2) for 10 min), Group III (33 patients, 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 min), and Group IV (33 patients, 30 mW/cm(2) for 3 min) underwent accelerated cross-linking. Changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, specular microscopy, and demarcation line were studied at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Improvement in the mean CDVA and SE were statistically significant in all groups except Group IV (P = .15 at 6 months, P = .17 at 12 months), with Group III (P = .01 at 6 and 12 months) showing the best results. Flattening of steep and flat keratometry was significant in Groups I (P = .01) and II (P = .01) as compared to the other groups. There was no significant difference in the pachymetry or specular microscopy in any of the groups. Groups I and II demonstrated a good demarcation line when compared to other groups.
CONCLUSION: Conventional CXL (Group I) and accelerated CXL with irradiations of 9 mW/cm(2) (Group II) and 18 mW/cm(2) (Group III) showed better visual, refractive, and tomographic improvements at the end of 12 months.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized interventional study.
METHODS: In this study, 138 eyes of 138 patients with progressive keratoconus underwent corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL). Following detailed preoperative examination, Group I underwent conventional cross-linking (36 patients, 3 mW/cm(2) for 30 min); Group II (36 patients, 9 mW/cm(2) for 10 min), Group III (33 patients, 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 min), and Group IV (33 patients, 30 mW/cm(2) for 3 min) underwent accelerated cross-linking. Changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, specular microscopy, and demarcation line were studied at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Improvement in the mean CDVA and SE were statistically significant in all groups except Group IV (P = .15 at 6 months, P = .17 at 12 months), with Group III (P = .01 at 6 and 12 months) showing the best results. Flattening of steep and flat keratometry was significant in Groups I (P = .01) and II (P = .01) as compared to the other groups. There was no significant difference in the pachymetry or specular microscopy in any of the groups. Groups I and II demonstrated a good demarcation line when compared to other groups.
CONCLUSION: Conventional CXL (Group I) and accelerated CXL with irradiations of 9 mW/cm(2) (Group II) and 18 mW/cm(2) (Group III) showed better visual, refractive, and tomographic improvements at the end of 12 months.