Pediatric pulmonology · 2026
Feasibility and Measurement Quality of Home-Based Smartphone Spirometry in Children With Suspected Asthma: A Multicentre, Prospective Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Knopek Antonia, Fabinyi Hanna, Zach Viktoria, Beliveau Anna, Hoekstra Nina Luisa, Nüssing Carlotta, Kainz Katharina, Weisser Swantje, Zschocke Anna, Zacharasiewicz Angela, Lex Christiane
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing asthma in children is challenging due to the episodic nature of symptoms and limitations of in-clinic lung function testing. Smartphone spirometry offers a potential solution by enabling repeated measurements in real-life settings. However, data on its feasibility in children with suspected but unconfirmed asthma are limited.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance, measurement quality, and agreement between manual and automated grading of smartphone spirometry in children with suspected asthma.
METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective study, 102 children aged 5-16 years with suspected asthma received a smartphone spirometer and were instructed to perform daily spirometry for 7 days. Measurement quality was assessed using ATS/ERS 2019 criteria by both manual review and automated device grading. Associations with age, supervision, and social factors were analysed.
RESULTS: Of 101 children with technically valid data, 93.1% performed at least one measurement series at home, while 31.7% completed measurements on all seven study days. Clinically usable measurement quality (grades A-C for both FEV1 and FVC) was achieved at least once by 61.7% (manual grading) and 74.5% (automated grading). Automated grading showed strong correlation and high agreement with manual grading (ICC = 0.90), but slightly overestimated quality. Measurement quality was not significantly associated with age, supervision, or social factors.
CONCLUSION: Smartphone spirometry is feasible for home-based lung function assessment in children with suspected asthma. Compliance and measurement quality were moderate but acceptable for clinical interpretation in most participants. Automated grading aligns well with manual review though potential discrepancies should be considered in clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance, measurement quality, and agreement between manual and automated grading of smartphone spirometry in children with suspected asthma.
METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective study, 102 children aged 5-16 years with suspected asthma received a smartphone spirometer and were instructed to perform daily spirometry for 7 days. Measurement quality was assessed using ATS/ERS 2019 criteria by both manual review and automated device grading. Associations with age, supervision, and social factors were analysed.
RESULTS: Of 101 children with technically valid data, 93.1% performed at least one measurement series at home, while 31.7% completed measurements on all seven study days. Clinically usable measurement quality (grades A-C for both FEV1 and FVC) was achieved at least once by 61.7% (manual grading) and 74.5% (automated grading). Automated grading showed strong correlation and high agreement with manual grading (ICC = 0.90), but slightly overestimated quality. Measurement quality was not significantly associated with age, supervision, or social factors.
CONCLUSION: Smartphone spirometry is feasible for home-based lung function assessment in children with suspected asthma. Compliance and measurement quality were moderate but acceptable for clinical interpretation in most participants. Automated grading aligns well with manual review though potential discrepancies should be considered in clinical decision-making.