Advances in therapy · 2024
Assessment of Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomer Treatment Patterns for Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A MarketScan Claims Analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klimchak Alexa C, Signorovitch James, Innis Bryan, Laverty Chamindra G, Gooch Katherine
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs), weight-based treatments administered weekly by intravenous infusion, are approved in the US for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) amenable to certain exon skipping. Evidence regarding PMO treatment patterns in real-world settings is limited. This study used longitudinal administrative claims data to characterize PMO treatment patterns among US patients with DMD.
METHODS: MarketScan® commercial and Medicaid data (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021) were used to identify claims for PMO treatments (eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, casimersen). The proportion of days covered (PDC), proportion with continuous PMO claims coverage (no gaps in claims ≥ 30 days), and time to subsequent PMO claims after a ≥ 30-day gap in PMO claims were described.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients with ≥ 1 PMO claim were identified. Multiple codes were needed to identify PMO treatment coverage. Mean age was 14.1 years; all patients were male. Mean continuous follow-up duration was 669.3 days. Median PDC was 83.4%. Seventy-four (55.6%) patients had continuous PMO claims coverage (no ≥ 30-day gaps in claims). Of the 59 patients with ≥ 1 gap in PMO claims of ≥ 30 days, 39 had ≥ 1 subsequent PMO claim. Accounting for censoring via Kaplan-Meier analysis, 75.5% had a subsequent PMO claim within 1 year after a ≥ 30-day gap, with a median time of 64 days (including the qualifying 30 days).
CONCLUSION: Understanding treatment patterns is important for characterizing real-world utilization of precision genetic medicines. This study observed a high PDC for PMO treatments for DMD. Most patients had continuous PMO claims coverage, and most patients with a gap in PMO claims had a subsequent PMO claim. Nonetheless, the observed persistence may have been underestimated given shortcomings of claims data and payer coverage considerations. Caution should be exercised when inferring treatment effectiveness or tolerability based on observed treatment patterns from claims data alone for weight-based, infused PMO treatments.
METHODS: MarketScan® commercial and Medicaid data (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021) were used to identify claims for PMO treatments (eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, casimersen). The proportion of days covered (PDC), proportion with continuous PMO claims coverage (no gaps in claims ≥ 30 days), and time to subsequent PMO claims after a ≥ 30-day gap in PMO claims were described.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients with ≥ 1 PMO claim were identified. Multiple codes were needed to identify PMO treatment coverage. Mean age was 14.1 years; all patients were male. Mean continuous follow-up duration was 669.3 days. Median PDC was 83.4%. Seventy-four (55.6%) patients had continuous PMO claims coverage (no ≥ 30-day gaps in claims). Of the 59 patients with ≥ 1 gap in PMO claims of ≥ 30 days, 39 had ≥ 1 subsequent PMO claim. Accounting for censoring via Kaplan-Meier analysis, 75.5% had a subsequent PMO claim within 1 year after a ≥ 30-day gap, with a median time of 64 days (including the qualifying 30 days).
CONCLUSION: Understanding treatment patterns is important for characterizing real-world utilization of precision genetic medicines. This study observed a high PDC for PMO treatments for DMD. Most patients had continuous PMO claims coverage, and most patients with a gap in PMO claims had a subsequent PMO claim. Nonetheless, the observed persistence may have been underestimated given shortcomings of claims data and payer coverage considerations. Caution should be exercised when inferring treatment effectiveness or tolerability based on observed treatment patterns from claims data alone for weight-based, infused PMO treatments.