MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31825c10dc

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of glaucoma · 2014

Impaired saccadic eye movement in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Lamirel Cédric, Milea Dan, Cochereau Isabelle, Duong Minh-Hanh, Lorenceau Jean

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Our study aimed at investigating the extent to which saccadic eye movements are disrupted in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). This approach followed upon the discovery of differences in the eye-movement behavior of POAG patients during the exploration of complex visual scenes.

METHODS

The eye movements of 8 POAG patients and 4 healthy age-matched controls were recorded. Four of the patients had documented visual field scotoma, and 4 had no identifiable scotoma on visual field testing. The eye movements were monitored as the observers watched static and kinetic targets. The gain, latency, and velocity-peak latency of the saccades recorded were then analyzed.

RESULTS

In POAG patients, with abnormal visual fields, watching a static target, the saccades were delayed and their accuracy was reduced, compared with those of normal observers. In POAG patients, with normal and abnormal visual fields, watching a kinetic target, a task involving precise motion analysis, the latency and accuracy of the saccades were impaired, compared with those of normal observers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that POAG alters saccade programming and execution particularly in the case of moving targets.

Для цитирования: Lamirel Cédric, Milea Dan, Cochereau Isabelle, Duong Minh-Hanh, Lorenceau Jean. Impaired saccadic eye movement in primary open-angle glaucoma.. Journal of glaucoma. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31825c10dc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.