Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR · 2012
Inter-tibiofibular graft for traumatic segmental bone defect of the tibia.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fitoussi F, Masquelet A-C, Rigal S, Poichotte A, Bauer T, Fabre A, French Society of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery (SoFCOT)
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The present study sought to assess the interest of inter-tibiofibular graft (ITFG), alternatively called posterolateral bone graft, in traumatic segmental tibial bone defect.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight ITFGs were performed in 125 tibial reconstructions for traumatic bone defect. Patient's records were reviewed retrospectively in a multicenter study. Tibial reconstruction with and without ITFG was compared for bone healing and patient's return to full weight-bearing status.
RESULTS: There were no failures of bone healing in the ITFG group, versus 14 (14%) in the non-ITFG group. Graft-to-consolidation delays were shorter with first-line ITFG, at a mean 10 months (range, 3-20 months) versus 16.5 months (range, 3-63 months) in the non-ITFG group (P<0.05). Weight-bearing was likewise more quickly resumed, with full weight-bearing at a mean 9 months (range, 3-19 months) versus 15 months (range, 1-34 moths) respectively (P<0.05). Return to work was also quicker, at a mean 15 months (range, 4-28 months) versus 27 months (range, 8-56 months) respectively (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION: This study confirmed the interest of ITFG in tibial bone defect reconstruction. ITFG may singly be used for small defects less than 4 cm, or in conjunction with another tibial reconstruction technique; ITFG in the present series achieved consolidation in all cases and significantly shortened the times to return to full weight-bearing status and to work.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III: retrospective case-control study.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight ITFGs were performed in 125 tibial reconstructions for traumatic bone defect. Patient's records were reviewed retrospectively in a multicenter study. Tibial reconstruction with and without ITFG was compared for bone healing and patient's return to full weight-bearing status.
RESULTS: There were no failures of bone healing in the ITFG group, versus 14 (14%) in the non-ITFG group. Graft-to-consolidation delays were shorter with first-line ITFG, at a mean 10 months (range, 3-20 months) versus 16.5 months (range, 3-63 months) in the non-ITFG group (P<0.05). Weight-bearing was likewise more quickly resumed, with full weight-bearing at a mean 9 months (range, 3-19 months) versus 15 months (range, 1-34 moths) respectively (P<0.05). Return to work was also quicker, at a mean 15 months (range, 4-28 months) versus 27 months (range, 8-56 months) respectively (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION: This study confirmed the interest of ITFG in tibial bone defect reconstruction. ITFG may singly be used for small defects less than 4 cm, or in conjunction with another tibial reconstruction technique; ITFG in the present series achieved consolidation in all cases and significantly shortened the times to return to full weight-bearing status and to work.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III: retrospective case-control study.