Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2023
Incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oliveira-Cortez Andreza, Rodrigues Ferreira Isabela, Luíza Nunes Abreu Carolina, de Oliveira Bosco Yvina, Kümmel Duarte Camila, Nogueira Cortez Daniel
Аннотация
AIM: Investigate the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer.
METHOD: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using RevMan software. A systematic search of Medline databases via PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scopus databases, and Web of Science was performed until July 2021. In addition to investigating the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer, the influence of the variables of the Human Development Index (HDI), glycated hemoglobin, and follow-up time of the participants on the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) was analyzed through meta-regression. For the meta-analysis of cumulative incidence and possible variable associations, RevMan software was used in the Metaprop data package with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: A total of 9,772 articles were identified out of which 87 were selected and 12 studies ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of cumulative incidence was 5.65% (95% CI: 4.20; 7.57). By meta-regression, a significant inverse association was identified between DFU incidence and HDI (estimate - 2.38; 95% CI - 4.10--0.67; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The study presents the cumulative incidence for the first DFU, an inexistent datum in the national and international literature, and the HDI was inversely associated with the incidence of DFU.
METHOD: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using RevMan software. A systematic search of Medline databases via PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scopus databases, and Web of Science was performed until July 2021. In addition to investigating the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer, the influence of the variables of the Human Development Index (HDI), glycated hemoglobin, and follow-up time of the participants on the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) was analyzed through meta-regression. For the meta-analysis of cumulative incidence and possible variable associations, RevMan software was used in the Metaprop data package with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: A total of 9,772 articles were identified out of which 87 were selected and 12 studies ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of cumulative incidence was 5.65% (95% CI: 4.20; 7.57). By meta-regression, a significant inverse association was identified between DFU incidence and HDI (estimate - 2.38; 95% CI - 4.10--0.67; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The study presents the cumulative incidence for the first DFU, an inexistent datum in the national and international literature, and the HDI was inversely associated with the incidence of DFU.