MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00365540310017573

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases · 2004

Clinical characteristics, treatment and prognostic factors of candidal meningitis in a teaching hospital in Taiwan.

Chen Te-Li, Chen Hsin-Pai, Fung Chang-Phone, Lin Ming-Ying, Yu Kwok-Woon, Liu Cheng-Yi

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The prognostic factors of candidal meningitis had rarely been studied owing to the rarity of this disease. We identified 17 patients with candidal meningitis at a teaching hospital in Taiwan over a 14-y period and give details of the clinical features, treatment, outcome and prognostic factors of this disease. 10 patients were children (1 was neonate) and 7 were adults. The clinical features and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings were non-specific. The disease was diagnosed > 72 h after hospitalization in 14 (82%) patients. The most frequently isolated species was Candida albicans (65%). Regimens of therapy included intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB) or fluconazole alone, or a combination of intravenous AmB with intrathecal AmB, flucytosine or fluconazole. All indwelling central nervous system devices were externalized or removed. Four adults died of the disease. Three of them had malignancy and had received < 48 h of antifungal therapy. For adult patients with malignancy, early diagnosis and alternative treatment modalities with newer antifungal agents may be needed.

Для цитирования: Chen Te-Li, Chen Hsin-Pai, Fung Chang-Phone, Lin Ming-Ying, Yu Kwok-Woon, Liu Cheng-Yi. Clinical characteristics, treatment and prognostic factors of candidal meningitis in a teaching hospital in Taiwan.. Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. 2004. DOI: 10.1080/00365540310017573.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.