Management of late extrusions of cochlear implants.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The study aimed to identify the important principles in repairing and preventing delayed cochlear implant extrusions.
STUDY
DESIGN
The study design was a retrospective, international database review and three case presentations from the authors' local database.
SETTING
The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Cochlear Corporation's database of 8,665 implantees in North and South America and Israel was studied. A subset of this database, consisting of 74 patients implanted through the Louisiana State University/Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat (LSU/EENT) project, is analyzed separately and provides the case reports.
INTERVENTION: Surgical repair of skin breakdown over the edge of three cochlear implants using a two-layer, pericranial and scalp rotation flap technique was performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A functioning cochlear implant with a healthy skin covering was measured.
RESULTS
The three LSU/EENT cases reported here used a pericranial flap to repair the capsule of the implant and a large scalp rotation flap to repair the skin defect. A novel pericranial tuck-under technique is especially useful for the Nucleus Mini-22 implant. With this technique, the authors have had a 100% success rate (3 of 3). The basic principles used in the repair and in the initial implant surgery are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were reached: 1) avoid skin closure lines parallel to the cochlear implant edge that are closer than 1.5 cm from the implant edge; 2) excise enough skin and scar around the dehiscence to achieve principle 1; 3) design a large, well-vascularized anterior- or posterior-based scalp rotation flap to cover this defect; and 4) close the implant capsule defect with a well-vascularized pericranial flap.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.