Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2002
Techniques to avoid atrioventricular block during radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal tachycardia substrates in young patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pecht Benjamin, Maginot Kathleen R, Boramanand Nicole K, Perry James C
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has proven safe for most young patients, but the risk of inadvertent atrioventricular (AV) block remains. The purpose of this report is to describe techniques to avoid inadvertent AV block during effective RFCA in young patients with septal tachycardia substrates.
METHODS: The techniques included intubation and apnea during RFCA, coronary sinus pacing during RFCA to observe intact AV conduction during junctional ectopy, localizing the optimal His electrogram prior to RFCA, not ablating during tachycardia and titrating power output with temperature monitoring.
RESULTS: In the period January 1995-June 2001, RFCA of 424 tachycardia substrates was performed. A total of 217 consecutive septal tachycardia substrates are included in this report. Apnea eliminated a mean catheter tip displacement of 5.4 +/- 2.5 mm seen during respiration. No patient experienced transient or permanent complete AV block after any of the 217 substrate ablation procedures. All of the patients had normal PR intervals following ablation without development of any degree of AV block in 194 patients at latest follow-up. RFCA success for substrates with septal accessory pathways was 87/96 (91%), permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) 15/16 (94%), typical atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) 82/85 (96%), atypical AVNRT 6/7 (86%) and intra-atrial reentry tachycardia (IART) 10/13 (77%). Fluoroscopy time averaged 10.8 minutes. For patients with accessory pathway, 8 (7.9%) developed a recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Catheter stability is paramount to safe and effective RFCA in septal locations. Use of these techniques resulted in acceptable success rates and low recurrence rate for RFCA of septal tachycardia substrates while avoiding inadvertent AV block in these young patients.
METHODS: The techniques included intubation and apnea during RFCA, coronary sinus pacing during RFCA to observe intact AV conduction during junctional ectopy, localizing the optimal His electrogram prior to RFCA, not ablating during tachycardia and titrating power output with temperature monitoring.
RESULTS: In the period January 1995-June 2001, RFCA of 424 tachycardia substrates was performed. A total of 217 consecutive septal tachycardia substrates are included in this report. Apnea eliminated a mean catheter tip displacement of 5.4 +/- 2.5 mm seen during respiration. No patient experienced transient or permanent complete AV block after any of the 217 substrate ablation procedures. All of the patients had normal PR intervals following ablation without development of any degree of AV block in 194 patients at latest follow-up. RFCA success for substrates with septal accessory pathways was 87/96 (91%), permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) 15/16 (94%), typical atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) 82/85 (96%), atypical AVNRT 6/7 (86%) and intra-atrial reentry tachycardia (IART) 10/13 (77%). Fluoroscopy time averaged 10.8 minutes. For patients with accessory pathway, 8 (7.9%) developed a recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Catheter stability is paramount to safe and effective RFCA in septal locations. Use of these techniques resulted in acceptable success rates and low recurrence rate for RFCA of septal tachycardia substrates while avoiding inadvertent AV block in these young patients.