The International journal of neuroscience · 2004
Visual evoked potential is superior to triple dose magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of optic nerve involvement.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Acar Göksemin, Ozakbas Serkan, Cakmakci Handan, Idiman Fethi, Idiman Egemen
Аннотация
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether VEP is sensitive to optic neuritis (ON) when compared with triple dose orbital MRI. Twenty-four relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients were included in the study. Group I (n = 10) patients with acute ON, Group II (n = 8): patients presenting with a current relapse who had the history of ON in the previous relapses. Group III (n = 6): patients presenting with a current relapse but with no history of ON. Neuro-ophtalmological evaluation. VEP investigation and orbital MRI with triple dose (0.3 mmol/kg) gadolinium (Gd) were carried out for all. VEP was found to be 70% sensitive and 12.5% specific to the acute ON, whereas orbital MRI with triple dose Gd was 70% sensitive and 100% specific. In chronic ON, the sensitivity of orbital MRI is 0%, whereas the VEP is still 75% sensitive to chronic optic nerve involvement and can distinguish the pathology 100% specifically. In conclusion, orbital MRI with triple dose Gd is not more sensitive than VEP in determining the acute optic nerve pathologies but it is a 100% specific method. The results suggest that VEP is superior to the orbital MRI in determining the chronic optic nerve involvement.