MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215121004187

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2021

Skull base pathology - a diagnostic conundrum.

Devakumar H, Cereceda-Monteoliva N, Weir J, Ferguson M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Myoepithelioma is a rare benign neoplasm, most commonly derived from salivary glands, but there are limited cases of extra salivary gland involvement too. There is little knowledge on typical investigative findings and, instead, diagnosis relies on immunohistochemistry analysis. To our knowledge, this paper reports the 13th case of sinonasal myoepithelioma in the English literature.

CASE REPORT: This paper presents a 25-year-old man who complained of chronic nasal obstruction. A sinonasal mass was noted on examination that appeared benign on imaging. Biopsy revealed a grade 2 chondrosarcoma that was endoscopically resected; however, excisional margins were positive. On histopathological review at the multidisciplinary team meeting, the lesion was more in keeping with chondromyxoid fibroma, but immunohistochemistry analysis confirmed a myoepithelioma lesion. In light of this revised diagnosis, quorate opinion was for follow up with active monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal tumours require a thorough history, examination and investigation before a treatment plan can be formulated. If there is diagnostic uncertainty, it is important to keep a wide differential list and seek a second specialist opinion where possible.

Для цитирования: Devakumar H, Cereceda-Monteoliva N, Weir J, Ferguson M. Skull base pathology - a diagnostic conundrum.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2021. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121004187.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.